Turnovers, Turnovers and *checks notes…..*More turnovers
2016(9-7 Record) 4 Single Score Losses
(1) 1-Possession Loss With 1 or 0 Turnovers
vs OAK 24-30
(3) 1-Possession Losses With Multiple Turnovers
vs LAR 32-37 (2 Turnovers)
vs DAL 20-26 (4 Turnovers)
vs N.O. 24-31 (2 Turnovers)
2017(5-11 Record) 7 Single Score Losses
(3) 1-Possession Loss With 1 or 0 Turnovers
vs NE 14-19
@ GB 20-26
vs ATL 21-24
(4) 1-Possession Losses With Multiple Turnovers
@ ARI 31-38 (2 Turnovers)
@ BUF 27-30 ( 3 Turnovers)
vs DET 21- 24 (5 Turnovers)
vs CAR 19-22 ( 3 Turnovers)
2018(5-11 RECORD) 7 Single Score losses
(2) 1-possession Losses With 1 or 0 Turnovers
@ BAL 12-20 (1 Turnover)
vs ATL 32-34 (1 Turnover)
(5) 1-Possession Losses With Multiple Turnovers
vs PIT 27-30 (4 Turnovers)
@ ATL 29-34 (2 Turnovers)
@ CIN 34-37 (4 Turnovers)
@ NYG 35-38 (4 Turnovers)
@ DAL 20-27 (2 Turnovers)
2019(7-9 RECORD) 6 Single Score Losses
(3) 1-possession Losses With 1 or 0 Turnovers
@ NYG 31-32 ( 1 TURNOVER)
@ N.O. 24-31 (0 TURNOVERS)
@ SEA 24-30 (1 Turnover)
(3)1-Possession Losses With Multiple Turnovers
@ TEN 23-27 (4 Turnovers)
vs HOU 20-23 ( 5 Turnovers)
vs ATL 22-28 (3 Turnovers)
When the TEAM doesn't turn it over multiple times, the TEAM has been capable of being more than decent.
Unfortunately the TEAM has been at or near the bottom or the turnover list every year since 2016. No other team makes bottom 5 more than once.
2016-24th
2017-26th
2018-32nd
2019-32nd
And if you're really interested in whether or not this a chicken-before-the-egg scenario, I implore you to go look up the situational stats which tell you when INTs and Fumbles actually happened.
